Archived Policy: This policy is outdated and kept only for historical reference.

5-304 - THREATENING THE USE OF FORCE AND DE-ESCALATION

5-304 - THREATENING THE USE OF FORCE AND DE-ESCALATION

  • Dates Effective: 07-28-2016 to 05-31-2012
  • Revision Type: Edited - Major
  • DataSource: Conversion failed when converting from a character string to uniqueidentifier. DataSource: Conversion failed when converting from a character string to uniqueidentifier.

(10/16/02) (06/01/12) (07/28/16)
(A-D)
A. Threatening the Use of Force

As an alternative and/or the precursor to the actual use of force, MPD officers shall consider verbally announcing their intent to use force, including displaying an authorized weapon as a threat of force, when reasonable under the circumstances. The threatened use of force shall only occur in situations that an officer reasonably believes may result in the authorized use of force. This policy shall not be construed to authorize unnecessarily harsh language. (08/17/07) (07/28/16)

B. De-escalation

Whenever reasonable according to MPD policies and training, officers shall use de-escalation tactics to gain voluntary compliance and seek to avoid or minimize use of physical force. (06/01/12) (07/28/16)

1. When safe and feasible, officers shall:

a. Attempt to slow down or stabilize the situation so that more time, options and resources are available. 

i. Mitigating the immediacy of threat gives officers more time to call additional officers or specialty units and to use other resources.

ii. The number of officers on scene may make more force options available and may help reduce overall force used.

b. Consider whether a subject’s lack of compliance is a deliberate attempt to resist or an inability to comply based on factors including, but not limited to:

Medical conditions
Mental impairment
Developmental disability
Physical limitation
Language barrier
Influence of drug or alcohol use
Behavioral crisis

Such consideration, when time and circumstances reasonably permit, shall then be balanced against incident facts when deciding which tactical options are the most appropriate to resolve the situation safely.

2. De-escalation tactics include, but are not limited to:

Placing barriers between an uncooperative subject and an officer.
Containing a threat.
Moving from a position that exposes officers to potential threats to a safer position.
Reducing exposure to a potential threat using distance, cover or concealment.
Communication from a safe position intended to gain the subject’s compliance, using verbal persuasion, advisements or warnings.
Avoidance of physical confrontation, unless immediately necessary (e.g. to protect someone or stop dangerous behavior).
Using verbal techniques to calm an agitated subject and promote rational decision making.
Calling additional resources to assist, including more officers, CIT officers and officers equipped with less-lethal tools.


Definitions

Refer to the Commonly Used Terms page for general definitions.


DataSource: Conversion failed when converting from a character string to uniqueidentifier.

Revision Types and Descriptions

  • New: Policy had been added.
  • Combined: Two or more policies were merged.
  • Definitions Update: A glossary definition was updated.
  • Terms Update: A term, not necessarily tied to the glossary, was updated in the Manual.
  • Edited - Major: Significant content or procedural changes.
  • Edited - Minor: Small edits, clarifications, or formatting changes.
  • Renamed: Policy title changed.
  • Renumbered: Policy number was changed.
  • Split: Single policy was divided into multiple.
  • Eliminated: Policy was removed and is no longer in effect.
  • PRH Implementation: Edits for the Policy and Resource Hub; no content changes.