Archived Policy: This policy is outdated and kept only for historical reference.

5-318 - REMOTE RESTRAINT DEVICE

5-318 - REMOTE RESTRAINT DEVICE

  • Dates Effective: 10-18-2019 to 09-07-2020
  • Revision Type: New

 

5-318          REMOTE RESTRAINT DEVICE (10/18/19)

 

I.             PURPOSE

 

A.     The MPD recognizes that combative, non-compliant, armed or otherwise violent subjects cause handling and control problems that require special training and equipment.

 

B.     The purpose of a remote restraint device is to facilitate a safe and effective response by immobilizing and controlling resistive or non-compliant persons and persons with known or suspected mental health issues, and minimizing injury to suspects, subjects, and officers.

 

II.          DEFINITIONS

 

Remote Restraint Device: The BolaWrapTM  is the only currently authorized remote restraint device. It is a hand-held device that discharges an eight-foot bola style Kevlar tether to entangle an individual at a range of 10-25 feet.

 

III.       POLICY

 

A.    The remote restraint device has limitations and restrictions requiring consideration before its use. The device shall only be used when its operator can safely approach the subject within the operational range of the device. Although the device is generally effective in controlling most individuals, officers should be aware that the device may not achieve the intended results and be prepared with other options.

 

B.     The remote restraint device should not be used in potentially deadly force situations without firearm backup.

 

1.      When used according to the specifications and training, the device should be considered a low-level use of force.

 

2.      Prior to using the device, officers need to consider any risks to the public or themselves

 

C.    Only officers trained in the use of the remote restraint devices are authorized to carry and use them.

 

D.    Officers are only authorized to carry department remote restraint devices while on-duty in a patrol response function. Officers shall ensure that remote restraint devices are secured at all times.

 

IV.        PROCEDURES/REGULATIONS

 

A.     Standard devices

 

Officers shall only carry MPD-approved remote restraint devices, cartridges and cutters. No personally owned remote restraint devices shall be carried or used.

 

B.     Target areas

 

1.      Reasonable efforts should be made to target lower extremities or lower arms.

 

2.      The head, neck, chest and groin shall be avoided.

 

3.      If the dynamics of a situation or officer safety do not permit the officer to limit the application of the remote restraint device to a precise target area, officers should monitor the condition of the subject if it strikes the head, neck, chest or groin until the subject is examined by paramedics or other medical personnel.

 

C.     Deployment

 

1.      The remote restraint device may be used in any of the following circumstances, when the circumstances perceived by the officer at the time indicate that such application is reasonably necessary to control a person:

 

a.       The subject is violent or is physically resisting.

 

b.      The subject has demonstrated, by words or action, an intention to be violent or to physically resist, and reasonably appears to present the potential to harm officers, themselves or others.

 

2.      Remote restraint devices should not be used on individuals who are merely fleeing on foot, without other known and articulable facts or circumstances. Prior to using the device on a subject in flight the following should be considered:

 

a.       The severity of the crime at issue;

 

b.      Whether both of the following apply:

 

·         The subject poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officer or others, and;

·         The officer has a reasonable belief that using the device would not cause significant harm to the subject fleeing unless use of deadly force would otherwise be permitted.

 

3.      The aiming laser shall never be intentionally directed into the eyes of anyone as it may permanently impair their vision.

 

4.      For tactical reasons, the deploying officer should attempt to avoid being the contact officer.

 

D.     Other deployment considerations

 

1.      Certain individuals

 

The use of the remote restraint device on certain individuals should generally be avoided unless the totality of the circumstances indicates that other available options reasonably appear ineffective or would present a greater danger to the officer, the subject or others, and the officer reasonably believes that the need to control the individual outweighs the risk of using the device. This includes:

 

·         Individuals who are known to be pregnant.

·         Elderly individuals.

·         Children (known to be or who appear to be under the age of 12).

·         Individuals who are handcuffed or otherwise restrained.

·         Individuals detained in a police vehicle.

·         Individuals in danger of falling or becoming entangled in machinery or heavy equipment, which could result in death or serious bodily injury.

·         Individuals near any body of water that may present a drowning risk.

·         Individuals whose position or activity may result in collateral injury (e.g., falls from height, operating vehicles).

 

2.      Repeated applications of the device

 

If the first application of the remote restraint device appears to be ineffective in gaining control of an individual, officers should consider certain factors before additional applications of the device, including:

 

·         Whether the Kevlar cord or barbs are making proper contact.

·         Whether the individual has the ability and has been given a reasonable opportunity to comply.

·         Whether verbal commands, other options or tactics may be more effective.

 

3.      Dangerous animals

 

The remote restraint device should not be deployed against an animal as part of a plan to deal with a potentially dangerous animal, such as a dog, etc. This device was not intended for use against animals. However, if the animal reasonably appears to pose an imminent threat to human safety and alternative methods are not reasonably available or would likely be ineffective the remote restraint device may be deployed to protect against harm to suspects, subjects and officers.

 

4.      Verbal warnings

 

a.       When feasible, officers should air a notification on the radio when arriving at a scene with the intention of using a remote restraint device.

 

b.      When appropriate given the situation, officers discharging a remote restraint device should yell "Bola, Bola, Bola!" prior to and during discharge.

 

c.       Officers shall air a notification on the radio as soon as feasible after discharging a remote restraint device to alert dispatch and other officers that the sound was a device being discharged.

 

d.      The fact that a verbal or other warning was given or the reasons it was not given shall be documented by the officer deploying the remote restraint device in the related report.

 

E.     Carrying and storage

 

1.      Officers shall only use department-approved remote restraint devices that have been issued by the Department.

 

2.      Only officers who have successfully completed department-approved training may be authorized to carry and deploy the remote restraint device.

 

3.      All remote restraint devices are clearly and distinctly marked to differentiate them from the duty weapon and any other device.

 

4.      Uniformed and plainclothes officers who have been authorized to carry the remote restraint device shall wear the device in an approved holster on their person or keep the device safely and properly stored in their City vehicle.

 

5.      Officers shall ensure that their remote restraint device is properly maintained and in good working order. Officers shall notify the Training Division of any issues, as the Training Division is in charge of inventory and maintenance of the devices.

 

6.      Officers should not hold both a firearm and the remote restraint device at the same time.

 

F.      Medical treatment

 

1.      Medical assistance shall be rendered as necessary in accordance with P&P 5-306 and the Emergency Medical Response policy (P&P 7-350).

 

a.       Additionally, any such individual who falls under any of the following categories should, as soon as practicable, be examined by paramedics or other qualified medical personnel:

 

·         The person is suspected of being under the influence of controlled substances or alcohol.

·         The person may be pregnant.

·         The remote restraint device pellets are lodged in a sensitive area (e.g., groin, female breast, head, face, neck).

 

2.      Officers on scene shall determine whether transporting the person to a medical facility is necessary to remove the pellets or barbs.

 

3.      If officers determine that cutting the tether is reasonable and appropriate, officers may cut the tether at the scene using medical scissors.

 

G.    Use of Force reporting

 

1.      Officers that deploy a remote restraint device shall report the force in accordance with P&P 5-306, and shall complete a report entitled "FORCE."

 

2.      If a supervisor was not notified prior to deployment, officers who deploy the remote restraint device shall notify a supervisor to respond to the scene.

 

3.      Officers shall document any injuries or points of contact, with photographs whenever possible.

 

4.      A supervisor shall respond to the scene any time a remote restraint device is used. The responding supervisor shall review the incident and complete a use of force review in accordance with P&P 5-307.

 

5.      Supervisors shall ensure that all expended cartridges, pellets, barbs and cord are collected and property inventoried if possible.

 

H.    Transport of subjects

 

If an officer transports the subject, the transporting officer shall inform any person providing medical care or receiving custody that the individual has been subjected to the application of the remote restraint device.

 

I.       BolaWrapTM pilot device form

 

1.      In addition to incident and force reporting, deployment of the remote restraint device shall be documented by each discharging officer using the BolaWrapTM Test and Evaluation form. The following information is required on the form:

 

·         Device and cartridge serial numbers.

·         Date, time and location of the incident.

·         Whether any display or laser deterred a subject and gained compliance.

·         Number of device activations and the duration between activations.

·         Range at which the device was used (as best as can be determined).

·         Locations of impact from any deployments.

·         Whether medical care was provided to the subject.

·         Whether the subject sustained any injuries.

·         Whether any officers sustained any injuries.

 

2.      The Training Division will periodically analyze the report forms to identify trends, including deterrence and effectiveness.

 

 

Definitions

Refer to the Commonly Used Terms page for general definitions.


Revision Types and Descriptions

  • New: Policy had been added.
  • Combined: Two or more policies were merged.
  • Definitions Update: A glossary definition was updated.
  • Terms Update: A term, not necessarily tied to the glossary, was updated in the Manual.
  • Edited - Major: Significant content or procedural changes.
  • Edited - Minor: Small edits, clarifications, or formatting changes.
  • Renamed: Policy title changed.
  • Renumbered: Policy number was changed.
  • Split: Single policy was divided into multiple.
  • Eliminated: Policy was removed and is no longer in effect.
  • PRH Implementation: Edits for the Policy and Resource Hub; no content changes.