10-117.02 - Statements Regarding Surveillance Video Identifications and Comparisons

10-117.02 - Statements Regarding Surveillance Video Identifications and Comparisons

  • Summary: Rules for using surveillance video evidence in suspect identifications and legal proceedings.
  • Effective Date: 01-01-2026
  • Revision Type: PRH Implementation, Terms Update
  • See other versions

Only a qualified Forensic Video Analyst can make, and testify to, comparisons done using video. Case reports and supplements must not state that persons or suspects have been positively identified or preliminarily identified from surveillance recordings by anyone other than trained forensic video analysts.

This does not preclude employees from developing a description of an individual (e.g. clothing appeared similar, suspect appeared similar to, etc.) based on video evidence and using that description as reasonable suspicion to stop and investigate an individual fitting that description.

 

Definitions

Refer to the Commonly Used Terms page for general definitions.


Revision Types and Descriptions

  • New: Policy had been added.
  • Combined: Two or more policies were merged.
  • Definitions Update: A glossary definition was updated.
  • Terms Update: A term, not necessarily tied to the glossary, was updated in the Manual.
  • Edited - Major: Significant content or procedural changes.
  • Edited - Minor: Small edits, clarifications, or formatting changes.
  • Renamed: Policy title changed.
  • Renumbered: Policy number was changed.
  • Split: Single policy was divided into multiple.
  • Eliminated: Policy was removed and is no longer in effect.
  • PRH Implementation: Edits for the Policy and Resource Hub; no content changes.